![]() ![]() “…I’d add a question of my own: what is the precision of the calculations? 16-bit, 32-bit? Integer, float? I think only somebody from the programmers can answer these types of questions. I agree, that it would be great to have a raw converter that works with aRGB or even ProPhoto RGB. I can always turn it into sRGB when I want to (like web) the other way around seems a lot harder (impossible with sRGB monitors I would then work in the blind). Without a wide gamut screen, I will never be able to see the proper/better colours / colour tones and nuances. My way of thinking is, that most computers are not showing images the same anyway, so why not start with a proper calibrated wide gamut and produce a kind of “master” image. Some people tell me it’s a complete nonsense to work on a wide gamut screen (or even a calibrated screen) they say, that by far most computers are not calibrated and only sRGB anyway. I don’t know the profiling software you’re using, but I presume the ColorNavigator in some Eizo’s (like the cg279x), will do this job (?). I do not do any video/no gaming…beside photography only surfing/mailing/etc. Superb screen…very clear/very nice/etc…but do I need a 4k or even 5k monitor? That’s what I’m asking myself…and the more times I ask myself, the more times, my answer is “no”. But still…no wide gamut monitor and for 90% I’m using my computer time for photography (processing/working on files/using DxO PhotoLab and Affinity Photo…no Adobe anymore, etc.) I doubt a 5k iMac can bring my photography to a next level. I’ve been thinking about a new iMac (newer models probably will come in 2019). So, could you forward those questions to somebody qualified to give the answer?Īt the moment I am working on an iMac (end 2013)/ i7/27"/32 Gb/3 Tb fusion drive. I’d add a question of my own: what is the precision of the calculations? 16-bit, 32-bit? Integer, float? I think only somebody from the programmers can answer these types of questions. I profile my monitor to its native gamut, rather than limiting it to sRGB or Adobe RGB, because I use colour-managed programs to process and view my photos in.īut PhotoLab doesn’t let you control the working colourspace and I think the OP would like to know what space is used to calculate the raw data before export. I use a wide-gamut Eizo with PhotoLab with no issues (setting it to “Current profile of the display device”, and making sure my system has the correct monitor profile loaded). So yes, if you calibrate and profile your monitor, PhotoLab allows you to use the correct monitor profile. I believe the question in the OP concerns two issues: the internal colour space and the monitor profile. Out of the three the user can control the last two parameters in PhotoLab. ![]() The preview translates the raw data interpreted by the internal colour space, the development settings and the monitor profile. they allow PhotoLab to generate a colour-managed preview. These settings are about proper colour-management, i.e. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |